After reading Neal
Stephenson’s “In the Beginning was the Command Line”, I think the
author covered a great deal of detail about the development and organization of
two rival companies – Microsoft Corporation and Apple Inc. The article started
with Jobs and Wozniak’s unorthodox success by selling information operating
systems; then came a more uncommon triumph made by Bill Gates and Paul Allen,
who tried to sell people computer operating systems.
At first, the competition between Microsoft and Apple seemed
irrelevant to me, as one is a software company while the other is a hardware
one, and both companies use the same programming language – telegrams – to
build their operating systems. Although Windows and Mac are somewhat similar in
functions, people take sides when it comes to discussing the “Windows versus
Mac” question. But as I kept reading, I realized that the source of debate
between Microsoft and Apple fans lied mostly in these companies’ interfaces and
management; this brought me to my questions: how many percentages do a
product’s appearance account in consumers’ mind when they make their purchase?
Why do consumers have the “I want to
believe” feeling, which eventually lead them to the fall into the business
“traps” of either Microsoft or Apple?
I am not sure about the latter question, but I agree that
the modern look of Macs excite me. However, when I actually used a Mac, I really
felt its human-centered design, in which Apple surpasses Microsoft. For
example, the Mac’s touchpad allow users to navigate through the interface by
making different finger movements. Most of the author’s arguments were around
the command line interface of Microsoft and the graphical user interface of
Apple. Besides, he also noted that Apple has a more effective advertising
campaign, allowing them to “plant the image of them being rebellious free
thinkers.” In my opinion, this feature really adds up to Apple’s success
because consumers see Apple as an energetic, technologically driven company
that has more potential in the future high tech world. In short, I second the
author’s opinion about Apple, whose computers are more aesthetically pleasing
and a “superb piece of engineering.”



